|
Few people reflect deeply on the superiority of the
intellect over the imagination, of the concept over
the accompanying sense image.
The mind, intellect, differs from all sense powers,
external and internal, because it has as primary
object not mere accidental facts, external or
internal, color, for example, or sound, or tactile
resistance, but rather intelligible and universal
reality. By reason of this object the mind knows the
raison d'etre of things, the causes of events, and
their purpose or goal.
The concept of being, of reality, underlies all other
concepts. The verb "to be" underlies every sentence.
"Peter runs" means "Peter is running." In a priori
judgments this "is" expresses essence. In a
posteriori judgments the "is" expresses existence.
Thus the infant's mind grows on a series of whys: Why
does the bird fly? Because it is looking for food
(its goal and purpose). To fly it needs wings
(instrumental cause). Its nature requires wings
(formal cause). It dies
because it is composed of matter and hence is
corruptible.
NOW these raisons d'etre, these sources and causes
(final, efficient, formal, material) are accessible
to reason only, not to sense and imagination. Reason
alone knows purpose as purpose. Imagination grasps
the thing which is purpose, but it does not grasp the
principle
of finality.Here we see the immeasurable distance
between image and concept. The image, say, of a clock
is a composite of sense qualities, color, sound, and
so forth. A concept of the clock makes this
sense-composite intelligible: a clock is a machine
which by maintaining uniform movements indicates
solar time. This concept, this
raison d'etre, inaccessible to the animal, is easily
grasped by the child.
Whereas sense and imagination are restricted to sense
objects as individual, as limited in space and time,
the intellect grasps these same objects as universal,
as realizable in whatever part of space and time.
Thus it grasps what the clock must necessarily be,
everywhere and always, in order to indicate solar
time. In like fashion the intellect rises from the
limited and particular sense good to the good that is
universal and unlimited.
Thus we conceive also what we need in order to become
what we should be. We need an object that is always
and everywhere good. Further we see that this object
must be unlimited reality, a supreme being wherein
unlimited good is completely realized.
The intellect conceiving supreme being, unlimited
good, sees likewise, at least confusedly, that this
being must exist. The mind sees things which begin
and end, corruptible things. Hence they must derive
existence from something that is self-existent and
able to give existence to other things. Otherwise the
more would arise from the less: effect without cause.
Similarly this truth holds universally: no motion
without a first mover, no living thing without a
first life, no mundane order without a supreme ruler,
no intelligent being
without a first mind. Shall we trace St. Augustine's
genius back to a blind, material fatality?
Now in the world of the will, in the moral world, we
meet this same truth: no morality, no law, without a
supreme legislator, no holiness without a supreme
holiness. Reason more or less confusedly grasps these
necessary truths.
How unmeasured, then, must be the immensity of man's
will, which is illumined, not by sense and
imagination, but by reason and intelligence!
Imagination, sense perception, leads animals,
herbivorous or carnivorous, each to the food it
needs. Intelligence leads man to an unlimited good, a
good which is to be found only in
that unlimited reality which is God, because He alone
is unlimited and essential good. Hence if sense has
such an inexhaustible reach in the daily life of the
animal world, how boundless must be the reach of
man's will in the pursuit of an unmeasured world of
good!
|